After news of the food-for-oil problem we've got a good old neocon going after the head of the UN. Grant there may be something to this.. But a Re-thug is the one calling for it?
Hello, Pot? This is Kettle.. You're black.
How can a republican in our current administration accuse someone of abusing a program of any kind? Someone, please give me an answer here?
Maybe Annan needs to be investigated, and then, if there is a link between him and this illegal act, we should consider legal action be taken against him and asking him to resign. Until we find proof he had a hand in either ignoring this issue or in promoting these activities, maybe we should back off. And just who the heck are we to be tossing around who should resign and expect the world to listen?!
If Annan resigned simply because some droopy-dog of a republican called for it during his half-assed face time on one of the NON-liberal media outlets then it would set a very dangerous precedent. If the leader of the UN is under the thumb of America then how will he/she represent the many nations of the world without bending to whatever might ONLY benefit America? Am I so wrong to believe not ever must bend to the will of America? If one should fall to the pressure from this attack poodle, then what about other leaders? It would only be a matter of time before they are accused of not agreeing with the will of Bushco and resignations demanded.
Not to mention.. Wouldn't it be hypocritical to expect Annan to resign when we demand it and not have Bush resign when someone from another country's political parties demands it?
Don't get me wrong, if there is a valid connection with proof (not WMD in Iraq proof), then we do need to take action. If not, then the attack poodles need to stop barking and go back to gnawing on the leg of America.
Huddled masses do not point a finger at someone when you believe they have done wrong, because you will find four other fingers pointing back at you.